Thoughts of Mads Nedergaard

Home

I left Cursor for VSCode
— but soon returned

July 2025

2 min read
tl;dr

Cursor is still (as of July 2025) superior to VSCode for AI-assisted coding. Compare the videos below to see how autocomplete is so much nicer in Cursor.

Context

I'm a software engineer with 10 YoE, and I've been happily using Cursor since Fall 2024, but given the recent pricing outrage I decided it was time to give VSCode another chance.

I switched to VSCode Insiders (as it supposedly has better AI support) + Traycer for a week - which was long enough to realise that Cursor is still ahead of the game!

Why Cursor is better

Chat-wise VSCode is fine, but what killed me is how far behind autocomplete is. And autocomplete is where AI in coding shines in my opinion, as it really boost productivity and avoids the small tedious tasks that adds up.

And here's the proof

This small and somewhat trivial refactor clearly shows the difference. With Cursor the same task took me half the time compared to VSCode.

Setup:

  1. I renamed a function and changed the signature slightly in one file.
  2. In another file that imports the function, I update the usage.

Cursor

Cursor in action

VSCode/Copilot

VSCode in action


So in conclusion, I'm back to Cursor.

I have dabbled with Gemini CLI and Claude Code, but I prefer writing code (with assistance) over writing prompts (and I rarely get great results for complex tasks anyway, but I guess that's because I'm not using that one magical prompt that makes everything great).

Tell me why I'm wrong

There's probably a hundred reasons why you believe this is all my own fault, how I missed something obvious or why I should buy your course on prompt engineering. Except for the last one, I'd genuinely like to hear them! Ping me on BlueSky and tell me if you have a different experience.